Saturday, December 28, 2013

Creativity in East and West

Here comes the certificate renewal time.  I simply wonder, why am I in the American Education?

A recent conversation with a childhood friend, who has Japanese college education himself, brought up this question.:

"How does the American Education differentiate from that of the Japanese?" 

"It will take all day to explain it," I told him.  That was absolutely true, but I froze a moment.  What is so different?

While being a student in Japan, I heard so many people say, "Japanese Education is lacking creativity."  They were making comments such as: Japanese students don't try to be extraordinary, Japanese students are afraid of being different, Japanese student's are all cookie cutters.  I wasn't sure it was true.  Creativity was not a big focus on any core subjects anyway, so why discuss creativity?  However, their visual arts were extraordinary.  Schools take sketching trips to the nearby parks, and organize school wide water color painting contests.  Although there was no word of "creativity," most of their art were breathtaking products that used sophisticated techniques on capturing objects, adjusting water, and experimenting with different colors.  In the performing arts, Japanese students exhibit their beautiful voices and instrumental sounds with amazing acts of unity.  Sometimes some students tried to be stand up comedians in the school talent shows.  They were all creativity, but only happened outside of math, reading, and writing.  As a result, the definition of creativity was in my mind as "artistic skills".

Therefore, there was no wonder that I was appalled at the American twenty students' art projects on a wall in my internship year in Idaho.  "American education is lacking creativity."   All second grade students used the same pattern and copied what their teacher did on the whiteboard.  Based on the individual cutting skills and strong or soft writing pressure, they created some differences among products; however, they all looked identical.  It was a culture shock.  I was witnessing the totally opposite phenomenon to what I had been told and I had believed.  As my internship went into getting deeply involved in observing other teachers and my own teaching practice, my view began changing.  I heard the word "creativity" quite often in many different occasions throughout a day.  Kids used manipulatives to solve a subtraction problem, were encouraged to sound out to spell, and shared their connection to the book, etc.  The basic teaching pedagogy was to promote students' creativity!  Japanese educators misinterpreted "creativity" and delivered the real education ground.  I realized I was one of those thousands of Japanese students who was victimized of misinterpretation in "global education". Yet, it was also true, using manipulatives was not necessarily helping this girl master her subtraction skills.  Creativity needed a purpose and guidance in Elementary Schools.

I told my friend, "Creativity is the strength in American Education, if kids have a proper academic foundation."

A strength in Japanese education is the strong academic foundation in early educational years.  This fundamental idea as Common Core State Standards, are ready to seep into the American education system.  Students will be able to recognize their own success in learning basics.  Application process is successful only when students obtain academic skills.  By applying these skills in many different ways, students will master specific skills.  Then they will feel ready for the higher level challenge.  Not only do they have content knowledge, but their persevering learning experiences make confident problem-solving citizens.  Most educators are excited about this historical reform in education.  I am too, but in a different way.  We found a way to connect the dots that should have been connected without tangling. Instead of envying other countries' higher achievement, importance of basics and creativity are now merging seamlessly in our country.

2014 is the official adapting year of the Common Core State Standards.   This is not a big change, but it is an opportunity for all educators to sort through their outstanding teaching skills and blend them with the academic foundation.  I am ready to face challenges using my creative thinking.  That's why I am in the American Education.







Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Advocate in Children

"...... all students must have the opportunity to learn and meet the same high standards if they are to access the knowledge and skills necessary in their post-school lives." (Common Core State Standards in Math) 

It is a voice of advocate like parents bringing up to the teacher about their concerns on their son's last math quiz.  Though both parents would work full time or juggle two jobs, advocates find the ways and time to communicate to the school.  They would also take advantage of the recent information technology to explore over advise they have been looking for.  Advocates care.  Children sense it. 

Educators and leaders in our country are trying to do similar in a large scale.  It is an urgent assignment that ALL students would be prepared to be responsible and productive citizens for their own life before flying away from their nest, the public education system.  Individual distinguished teachers understand it in depth all over the country.  So they deliver lessons every day with passion.  Children see it through their active engagement.

We need the efficient collaboration among all parties to be successful as an advocate for our children, our future, and our country.  Face it.  Realize it.  Take your part.  So you can be active on advocacy in education.  That makes you feel meaningful in the society you live in.  It leads toward our brightest future.




Thursday, July 11, 2013

Breaking the Code

Richard Gentry might be sorry for me how slow I get "IT".  But I know he will celebrate for my lightening bulb lit up, then the idea synopses spread out all over my brain.  Breaking the Code (Breaking the Code: The New Science of Beginning Reading and Writing).  

It started from my 8-years-old's question, "What is the Morse Code?"  while reading 10 Days Thomas Edison by David ColbertNeedless to say, Thomas Edison's inventions are in our daily lives.  Learning about his personal stories behind them are even more fascinating.  Here is an episode.  As a reward of saving his little son, Young Thomas asked James MacKenzie for teaching the telegraph operation instead of money.  Although Thomas was brilliant with persevereance, it took too large amount of time spending to learn just one code at a time all by himself.  MacKenzie became Thomas' mentor and, years later, an employee in Tom's project along with his son whom Thomas has saved. 

I turned to my daughter, "Each code has a special meaning.  But it is so hard to understand."  Then, I realized that printed language seems like a code for early childhood ages in reading and writing world.  If you have a efficient guidance and instruction like MacKenzie, you would gradually become an expert code breaker.  Again, hat's off for Richard Gentry for explaining how the children's brain at certain literacy level functions and how to help develop to the next stage. 

For English Language Learners who are not native English speaker, not only reading and writing, but listening and speaking are all complicated codes.  Fourth graders in Japan learn Romatization of Japanese, called Romaji.  Unlike traditional ways of the Japanese written format, all Japanese sounds beautifully turn into the miracle form of Roman Alphabet!  Students learn this coding system fairly quickly because almost all Japanese sounds are combination of one of 5 vowels and consonant.  For instance, do you understand what "Makudonarudo" is?  It's "McDonald's".  Fortunately and unfortunately, most 4th graders wouldn't know the significant difference between Japanese and English McDonald's in their sounds and spellings at the time. 

The nightmare begins in 7th grade when they officially learn English.  English is a subject they have to pass for good high schools and college, not a communication tool.  One of the smartest kids shared with me how to brilliantly memorize a word "Christmas" in the spelling test.  "You can say, 'Chiri' (dust in Japanese) 'sute' (throw away in Japanese) 'masu' (polite ending in Japanese)."  How amazing that "(I) throw dust away," turns into a traditional Western holiday!  I memorized his code.  I was so close, but got wrong by spelling, Chiristmasu. As a typical Japanese, my Christmas had a vowel at the end.

In 9th grade, there was a question that asked the translation from Japanese to English.  I had no idea what "island" meant in English at all.  With my desperation, my pencil ran, "shima (島)," in the blank, hoping, my teacher would give some credit.  I was wrong.  No credit.  Japanese ways of code breaking strategies for the test taking didn't work well in my needs as a High School student.

Although I am not a foreign language expert, my instinct says, there must be some other ways for young Japanese students to break the English code.  What about more phonics instruction for Japanese students? (It's embarrassing at first, but fun to pop new sounds right from your mouth that you have never used in your life!)   What about oral responses instead of written ones?  Utilize computer software?  More individualization?

Then I realized that I came back to my own field.  Developing number sense is a code breaking as hard as reading and writing.  No wonder why many kids struggle in math.  Now my code breaking journey will sail off to the Elementary mathematical world.  To be continued.


Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Learning from All Star Little League Baseball Games

Whether if it's professional or amateur, All Star Games are played by the selected best players from teams in the region.  What's intriguing is that the best players don't necessarily play as the best teammates.  That's why each team's coach must have great skills to promote trust among young players.  To win or lose, watching your own child in the game is the best part, but there are some considerations between winning and losing.  That is the "trust".

In the fourth inning,  the All Star Little League Team Fabulous wanted more runs that would make them feel secure.  With two outs, a runner with the number 52 stole the second base.  The first base crowd roared like a thunder, almost forgetting about a young ball player with number 17 on his back in the batter's box.  The batter with the number 17 swung his bat fiercely.  He hit the ball.  The ball flew over the dugout.  Foul.  The whole audience sighed.  It was evident that most people, except his parents, didn't have much hope for a big hit from him, because of his batting record in this prestigious tournament.  All Star games intimidate many qualified players, no matter how well their seasons went in the smaller regions.  The blue uniformed pitcher threw another ball to the catcher.  "Strike!"  The count now became 2 strikes and 2 balls.  But as soon as the umpire made the call, the catcher somehow dropped the ball from his mitt.  He madly circled around home plate to look for his lost ball.  At another side of the diamond, the number 52 began dashing like a mad bull towards third base.  The third base coach yelled, "No, no, go back!"  The lucky catcher found his ball in 1 second and this lucky ball was in the third base players glove before the bull reached.  "Out!  Three outs!" The umpire exclaimed. While the whole audience reacted on the commotion of the bull, nobody noticed player number 17's disappointment in that of which he lost probably the last batting chance of his little league career. Team Fabulous lost their chance, but they were still 2 points ahead of their opponent.

Outfielders on the opponent team had been consistently cheering their teammates.  Under the coaches' strategies, several pitchers switched over the game.  Even though they were behind, their mental toughness was evident.

Team Fabulous was about to win at the bottom of last inning, however, the pitcher's physical strength was also running out.   Before they knew it, all bases were loaded.  Finally, a relief pitcher came to the mound.  Can you imagine, a 12 year old is on the demand of three straight strikes, three times in a row?  Perhaps he could of if he was called from the beginning of the inning.  As you can only imagine, Team Fabulous lost at the end.  All players dropped their heads down.  The relief pitcher told his teammates, "I don't care."

Dear readers, I am wondering if Team Fabulous could have had more trust, dignity, and respect to each other.  What if Number 52 had trusted Number 17?  Does 52 still try to steal the base?  Does 17 blame  52 on losing his chance to bat?   Didn't a relief pitcher really care about his team?  Was he embarrassed of the blame from teammates and fans?  These kids are only 11 to 13 years old.  Losing a game is sad, but most importantly, how to lose a game is a huge factor if the young players grow to be better players.  After all, baseball is not only a physical and technical game, but a team sport.  Sportsmanship and teamwork builds upon their trust. 

As a coach (teacher) myself, building a new community takes time and effort.  My hat is off for the All Star Coaches to do the same among these kids from different teams in such a limited time.  But don't you agree how essential it is for leaders to promote a team as a true team?  The team could cry together rather than complaining individually when they lose.  Then, at the end of the season party, all teammates and families would laugh and cheer about how great the season was, regardless of the result.  Kids would grow up and still remember these great memories of their comrades.  That is all about the Little league. 


Monday, July 1, 2013

Raising Frog Readers

Richard Gentry, PhD talks about the early literacy development as a life cycle of the frog in his book, Breaking the Code; The New Science of Beginning Reading and Writing.  As an example of non alphabetic writer as a tadpole, young children would add their tails and legs gradually.  Though, each individual developmental time varies.  Eventually, they would become aware of phonemic knowledge and being able to correspond letters and sounds in their writing.  This idea sounded revolutionary in my early literacy instructions yet several instructions have been commonly used in the classrooms all over the country.  The essential is to provide tadpole readers appropriate instructions at the appropriate developmental stage.  For instance, providing a fly to tadpoles doesn't make sense.  Tadpoles are not yet ready for flies at their dining table.  Gentry suggests several appropriate literacy activities at each developmental stage that made me hopeful in my future classrooms.

Then, my own journey began.  Take advantage of living in the the Information Technology era!  The technology devises will change the whole game plan in the literacy education.  As of the example of the Phase 0 Writers (Pre-Alphabetic), one of Gentry's suggestions is to begin teaching sounds.  Read Write Phonics  provides simple learning application on the touch screen devise.  This type of tool helps students become more independent and accountable for their own learning.  It can definitely be one of the literacy center activities.  I prefer explicit instructions to "Read to Self" and "Read to Partner" while kids are still tadpole readers because they would learn "inaccuracy" by not knowing how to read.  (It is necessary  to experience independent exploration of different books for the purpose of being familiar of books and learn how to turn pages, etc.  But that is more likely toddler and pre-school ages and settings.) With young user-friendly learning devise, a small reading group in K-2 grade classrooms can work independently while their teacher teaches another guided reading group. 

Another popular instructional example is Word Sorting activities. Another book by  Gentry, The Science of Spelling; The Explicit Specifics that Make Great Readers and Writers (and Spellers!), describes that word sort activities that benefit from pre-schoolers to 8th graders.  Kindly, Gentry shares the grade level appropriate spelling instruction samples in the Appendix B of this book. What I found in the technology world is "Word Family Sort".  This program is available in the Read Write Think site.  As soon as spelling patters are introduced, kids can apply their knowledge to this activity. 

Above all, there are millions and gazillions of literacy support applications out there.  It is imperative for teachers to understand the children's developmental stages in literacy and its appropriate instructions in depth, to start with.  Select high quality, simple, and self sufficient programs in your list.  Design these programs to be available for children's convenience.  Maybe original reference chart would be helpful, e.g., which students at the certain literacy phase might benefit from which program, etc. 

Our potential job is to raise our youngsters from tadpoles to frogs with patience and with the best knowledge about individual abilities and needs.  Once they become frogs, we have to teach them how to make higher leaps and cool tricks.  We also have to teach how to catch the best types of flies, not random ones.  It is not a one time job, after all.  Leap steadily and strongly day by day.  So, they, too, enjoy their literacy life on their lily pads.

Friday, June 21, 2013

Learning Is Fun

I totally agree with the concept.  If learning is fun, kids are motivated and they strive.  Teachers are busy, day after day, thinking how to make their lessons attractive and catchy so kids would be engaged.  There are millions of creative games, fancy fonts, and illustrations available online and in the book stores.  What  creative minds teachers in our country have!  Additionally, when your student answers math facts correctly, he would shoot a virtual zombi on the computer screen.  Kids would rush over to the computer like vultures, wanting to shoot as many zombis as they could.  Wait a minute!  Perhaps, these activities are fun and motivational, but are kids experiencing "learning" is fun?  Furthermore, are these creative materials and activities really fundamental "learning" experiences?

What I contemplate is the definition is learning and how to define it.  Here are some ideas I propose;

1. I read this book because I get a sticker. v.s. I want to read this book because I really would like to know what happens next!

2. I complete these problems because I can color after I am done.  v.s. I want to do more problems because I am getting confident in these problems. 

3. I write my journal because it is homework.  v.s. I want to keep my questions and findings around my life in my journal every day.

There is nothing wrong with first voice in each section, however, how powerful the second voices are!  That is the "learning" I am talking about.  When teacher's job becomes more than keeping every kid on task by providing fancy worksheets or stickers, learning is going to expand its definition; learning as understanding, discovering, collaborating, sharing, innovating, analyzing, feeling good about themselves, and appreciating people around them.

Thus, my job is not only teaching content areas, but providing students opportunities to consider themselves as fun learners who enjoy themselves through daily challenges.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Unexpected Ending

Two years in a row, something that I had never expected, at the end of the school year, happened.  Relationships.  It blew me away. 

Like many of you educators, I am one of them who try to connect to every student every day, but my effort is fruitless with some students in some days.  With some kiddos, I had no idea why and how else in the world I could make a difference in our relationships.  Tommy (not a real name) has never been sent to the "Refocus Seat".  Rather, he is almost always quiet and seems contained with his charming large eyes unless it is individual work time.  These has been no productive time in partner discussion, independent writing, and math worksheets.  His trimester reading log was empty.  You can easily imagine numeral strategies that can motivate a student like him.  Yes, I tried them all.  None of them worked and I was stuck.  When I visited him individually, he was tearful and whiny sometimes.  "You are mean to make me work."  I whispered, "I am sorry your feel that way.  And thank you for working on this sheet even though you don't like it."  Tommy didn't crumple and throw the worksheet away like other naughty ones do, but he just sat. 

Shortly after June started, I found a kind of stickers that have a chocolate scent.  These were a hidden gem for reluctant learners including Tommy!  Yes, he was caught by my hook.  "Will you save this sticker until I am done on this page?"  he asked.  I replied immediately, "Of course, I will because you will deserve it for your hard work."   It was the first positive interaction between Tommy and me.  He became more productive than ever with a little incentive, but it was already in June.   "I should have used the scented stickers earlier!  The school year would be over in less than two weeks," I blamed myself.  The stickers are only motivation for this intelligent young boy?  It sounded really pathetic, too.  But I had no more time.

All in all, wrapping up, time came up for saying good luck and good bye on the last day.  Numbers of smiling excited children went off from the door right at the final bell.  Tommy was the last one standing in the middle of the empty classroom.   His arms are open as wide as a eagle, walking toward me.  No words.  He just hugged me for a good fifteen seconds.  I felt literally grabbed or squeezed.  I knew it was not just a sticker.  I knew everything I did was not totally useless.  It is "diversity" in communication that every child develops at different paces.  

It is like solving a complicated math problem for hours and days.  Stick with the formula.  Play with it.  See it from different angles.  Keep trying.  Come back later if you are stuck.  Try several strategies that might fit.  Think. Verify.  Its answer blows me away.  It makes sense.  I did it!